The characteristics of top leadership

advent

a few leaderships were characterized as proper and have been used as challenges for others to emulate. This description but increases an apparent question: upon what standards had been those management characterized as appropriate? it's miles positive that some leaders, whose management does no longer fall inside this class, have desirable features that others can emulate. for that reason it's miles critical no longer best to know that a management has been characterised as proper however additionally to realize the traits that qualifies it as correct. in keeping with Anthony D'souza, leadership entails an inter-relationship among 3 factors:

(a) The high-quality abilities and needs of the fans
(b) The want and expectancies of the group
(c) The demands or necessities of the state of affairs.1

it could be discovered from what D'souza has said that the primary element deals with the personality of the chief; the second one, his fans and the third, the assignment to be carried out.

On the idea of what has been stated the characteristics of exact leadership could be diagnosed below the following headings:-

(a) The non-public traits of the leader
(b) The characteristics of the followers
(c) The chief's project or undertaking. decided on leaders inside the Bible, whose leaderships

had been categorized as right will shape the basis of this presentation.

(a) The private characteristics of the chief

it can be found from scriptures that God changed into very selective in selecting leaders for unique tasks. God specially selected Nehemiah to spearhead the rebuilding of the Jerusalem wall; Moses to deliver the Israelites out of bondage in Egypt; Paul, to pioneer missionary work to the Gentiles and David, whose kinship could have an enduring dynasty, to replace Saul. those guys truly had qualities that had been critical for correct management. God recognized those traits in them as potentials while He selected them.

on this phase a number of the qualities of leaders stated above can be discussed in a more popular manner. The aim is to show that it's been diagnosed that the coolest non-public characteristics of leaders, when applied to leadership are traits of exact leadership.

Nehemiah

In reflecting on the e book of Nehemiah, John White said that "the ebook of Nehemiah serves broadly speaking to unfold for us part of God's on-going plan for his human beings. however always it's miles the man, his person and his management that holds my interest".2 two critical matters stand out from John White's evaluative statement about Nehemiah's management which can be function of accurate management. the primary is the character and behavior of Nehemiah himself as a frontrunner and the second, is his management potential. White further recommended that probably one of the reasons why Nehemiah became selected as a cupbearer become due to a nicely-trained non-public excellent like that of a stable man or woman. Such properly-skilled stable man or woman became not just the attempt of Nehemiah by myself. this can be visible inside the following statement - "God used Nehemiah's active prayer lifestyles to mildew him right into a godly leader".three As a godly chief, Nehemiah was structured upon God from whom he acquired his non-public aid and encouragement, which stimulated him sufficient to be successful. Nehemiah done his ministry goal and his leadership has been characterized as precise. His excellent person and behavior and his demonstration of leadership skills were private characteristics of his management, which made him be successful.

Moses

Moses' youth training as an adopted son of Pharaoh's daughter turned into tailor-made closer to leadership. The prevalence, which caused his get away from Egypt, discovered that he diagnosed his management characteristics before God referred to as him to leadership. but, it took 40 years from the time of his break out from Egypt, earlier than God referred to as him to leadership. Joyce Peel determined that Moses learns the way to be a shepherd. long years of searching after sheep taught him the patience he was to want as leader of the cantankerous youngsters of Israel.four This remark by using Joyce Peel suggests that the non-public high-quality of persistence in Moses' existence became a feature of his right management. This best turned into made obvious within the lifestyles of Moses via the tremendous challenges he faced as a leader over Israel. One example turned into whilst he came down from Mount Sinai and determined the humans worshiping the golden calf. He smashed the pill inscribed with God's commandment, and, with a rousing cry, 'who is at the Lord's facet?', summons the trustworthy Levites to a bloodbath.5 day after today he reproaches the people after which brokenhearted, goes again up the mountain to plead for his or her forgiveness.6

persistence become no longer the simplest non-public satisfactory that Moses had. however it has been used to reveal that true private characteristics, whilst carried out to management, result in fine effects. consequently, correct personal traits are traits of appropriate management.

Paul

Paul made wonderful achievements inside the ministry God called him to. Achievements should but be visible as tips to personal capabilities or traits that a pacesetter has that made him to succeed. What then were the ones features in Paul that made him to be successful? First it'd be crucial to look at a number of the achievements that Paul made. He made extremely good impact in his missionary paintings and also in his writing. John Stott discovered that 13 letters ascribed to Paul in our New testament shape nearly exactly one zone of the whole New testomony. It become the rediscovery of the theology of Paul which caused the reformation of the 16th century, that theological revolution which precipitated an upheaval within the Roman Catholic Church and brought about the delivery of all the present day Protestant church buildings.7 Paul's educational heritage gave him this gain. It should now not pass omitted that this wonderful apostle used all that he had in my view accomplished in his adolescence in his leadership function. utilising his private traits in bringing approximately advantageous effects in his management became a feature of Paul's good leadership.

David

in keeping with Ted W. Engstrom, David the second king of Israel became a hanging evaluation to Saul, the primary king.eight This turned into due to his noble, generous and admirable qualities he tested in his leadership. This comparison indicates that David's leadership changed into no longer simplest higher than Saul's however his leadership may be characterised as exact. John C. Maxwell also in comparison the two leaders. In solution to a question, which he posed - 'Why did Saul fail as Israel's king even as David, who regarded to be weaker be successful?' he said that it turned into due to David's mind-set. unlike Saul, David tried to emerge as a higher leader.9 it's far clean from those  authors that David's personal qualities, in particular that of his mindset to continually be a higher leader had been characteristics of his appropriate management. Having the qualification or qualities is one element, however making use of them in one's management role is pretty another. David implemented his management qualities in main and made an impact as a frontrunner.

The characteristics of the fans

a number of the characteristics of accurate leadership may be diagnosed with the followers. earlier than figuring out these characteristics, it'd be useful to take a look at some definitions of management, to be reminded of the relationship between leaders and followers. consistent with Oswald Sanders, management is impact. it is the ability of one character to steer others to observe his or her lead. Ted W. Enngstrom defines management with just two phrases - 'leaders lead'. Myron Rush also gave a definition of leadership and his definition of leadership as 'chief reproducing himself at the fans'. those definitions point to the connection between leaders and followers however most significantly, what they taken into consideration to be the purpose of the relationship. Oswald Sanders and Engstrom consciousness at the thing of following. This attention identifies one of the characteristics of a good leadership - inclined followers. If one offers attention to D'souza's point noted inside the introduction, that one of the factors of leadership is 'the wishes and expectancies of the institution', it follows that one reason why human beings will willingly observe their leader is due to the fact their desires and expectations are met. any other function can be recognized from Myron Rush's definition - making chief out of fans, there's a assure of the continuity of that ministry. The four leaders, Nehemiah, Moses, Paul and David, whose leaderships have been categorised as proper, will now be used as check case to become aware of the 2 characteristics.

Nehemiah

whilst Nehemiah back to Jerusalem from Susa, he first personally assessed the situation of Jerusalem's destruction. Afterwards he called the people and shared his vision. The Bible said that the people spoke back to Nehemiah (see Neh. 2:8). This indicates definitely that from the start of his task Nehemiah had inclined followers. They were willing to comply with because they recognise that the imaginative and prescient turned into right and that a number of their wishes as a community could be met. Maxwell mentioned that the wall of Jerusalem changed into rebuilt because of Nehemiah's capacity to paintings with people and lead them wherein they want to head.10 This indicates that Nehemiah had inclined followers.

in addition Nehemiah gave recognition to subordinate leaders as he delegated obligations to them. This, as he stated, opens the management potentials for others.eleven consequently one can rightly say that Nehemiah not best had willing followers but additionally leaders were reproduced underneath his ministry.

Moses

when Moses lower back to Egypt to set the Israelites loose, they had been in the beginning excited. but when Moses made their situation worse they had been now not enthusiastic about freedom. but, by means of the end of the 9th plague that they had realized that Moses turned into God's servant sent to deliver them. They observed Moses' commands in watching the Passover and then willingly observed him as he led them out of Egypt.

there may be additionally scriptural proof that leaders have been produced below Moses' management. One example is that of Joshua, who replaced him. Joshua who were the non-public assistant of Moses was mentored with the aid of Moses to end up a pacesetter. Moses' management therefore had the characteristics of inclined followers and that of reproducing leaders.

Paul

even when he become "Paul the elderly", he remained the version and leader of a set of dynamic younger men. the love he kindled in his followers' heart become mirrored inside the tears that flowed when he informed them they might see him no more (Acts 20: 36-38).12 Sanders found out inside the passage referred to above that the apostle Paul's leadership had the characteristics of inclined followers. His ministry had notable effect in the lives of many, who had been additionally now not inclined to alternate his leadership for another.

like the Lord Jesus, Paul invested his existence on some people because he expected tons from them. these were the humans he took on his missionary journeys.  of the human beings, Timothy and Titus became leaders of nearby church buildings. consequently, like Moses, Paul's management had the characteristics of inclined fans and that of producing leaders.

David

David rose to fame when he killed Goliath, the Philistine large. Eugene H. Merrill, commenting on David's victory reserved that along with his growing recognition the various people came a deterioration of his courting with Saul, for the king have become insanely jealous of Israel's new hero.thirteen it is obvious that David had a huge following. humans followed him due to the capacity they saw in him. They diagnosed him as a first-rate leader, even earlier than authentic reputation changed into given to him.

David ruled Israel for about forty years and by the time he changed into stepping down as king, Solomon, his son had already been groomed for that function. So, like Nehemiah, Moses and Paul, David's management became characterised by inclined followers and the manufacturing of leaders.

(c) The leader's undertaking or commission

it may be discovered from scripture that God constantly deliver a specific assignment or undertaking to everyone he calls to management. a number of the traits of suitable management may be recognized within the way the leaders set out to perform their mission or task. There are two matters which are of number one significance to how a pacesetter accomplishes his task. those are his vision and his style of management. a pacesetter's vision and fashion of leadership may be characteristics of both appropriate and horrific leadership. however, on this segment the motive is to shoe how these  traits may be traits of top leadership.

in keeping with John Haggai, a vision is essential because it is a key aspect in a success management.14 a leader can have an awesome vision and yet his vision does not make a contribution in any way to make his leadership right. Haggai factors out what a leader wishes to do to make his vision a contributing characteristic to precise leadership. First, he says that each leaders and followers must grasp the vision. it's far the chief's responsibility to help the fans apprehend the vision and take delivery of it. 2d, both leader and followers ought to commit themselves to act at the vision. This movement entails designing a aim application to satisfy the imaginative and prescient. on this manner both the leader and fans are organized to face problems and do away with limitations. it's far on this way that a imaginative and prescient can be a function of precise leadership.15

the opposite aspects noted that may be a feature of a very good leadership is the fashion of management. management styles were given unique classification with the aid of authors. Anthony D'souza categorized management styles in a continuum wherein one stop is defined as task-orientated and the opposite as courting-orientated.sixteen Myron Rush also agreed with D'souza that management patterns can be visible in a continuum, but he used exclusive descriptive phrases for the one-of-a-kind patterns in the continuum.17 The four styles used within Rush's continuum are: dictatorial, authoritative, consultative and participative. those authors argument approximately patterns turned into now not to point out the nice but instead to show the importance of they all. The factor that they have been making was that a very good management had the traits of the distinct leadership patterns. The leader have to be bendy to the converting situations. whilst he's able to regulate his management styles to changing conditions, then his leadership patterns... turn out to be traits of good management. Myron Rush gave examples of situations where particular leadership patterns are appropriate. He said, dictatorial leadership fashion is appropriate in an emergency or while human beings's lives, are at stake; consultative style in accomplishing on-going planning for the department or business enterprise; authoritative fashion while employees continuously misuse authority and participative fashion as people become in a position in acting their routine duties.18

The 4 leaders stated in this paper, whose leaderships had been categorized as properly, will now be used as test instances to decide whether or not the factors referred to right here are characteristics of their leaderships.

Nehemiah

Joyce Peel, commenting on Nehemiah's mission of constructing the walls of Jerusalem said that a dispirited nation needs an stimulated chief who can unite and galvanize his humans into motion. this type of guy changed into Nehemiah.19 these words now not simplest found out that Nehemiah had a clear imaginative and prescient of his mission however also became able to make his fans understand the imaginative and prescient and dedicate themselves to behave on it. This was just one motive why they were able to rebuild the walls in fifty-two days. Many Jews lamented over the ruins of Jerusalem city wall, but it took the imaginative and prescient of 1 guy, who united the human beings and gave them wish to alternate the state of affairs. Engstrom also pointed to the truth that the human beings caught Nehemiah's imaginative and prescient and acted upon it, while he referred to: "One has best to study the e book of Nehemiah to discover the importance of human beings at work. The leaders in building the temple and city walls by no means lost sight of the whole intention and general picture. They have been capable of keep this cognizance with the aid of using all of the human beings as well as experts who have been skilled to do precise paintings".20 Nehemiah's management had the characteristic of a clear imaginative and prescient which changed into actively pursued by way of himself and his fans.

it may be discovered from the e-book of Nehemiah, that Nehemiah used the consultative fashion of management whilst he were given to Jerusalem to start the work. but inside the previous couple of chapters of the book, while things had been going wrong, his style of management modified to an authoritative one. consequently it can be said that Nehemiah's management had the traits of a imaginative and prescient and a converting style of leadership.

Moses

Moses has a clean imaginative and prescient whilst he returned to Egypt to guide the youngsters of Israel out of bondage. The Israelites desired to be free, however they doubted the possibility of Moses setting them loose. however, after they became certain that Moses changed into God's servant who will set them free from bondage, they obeyed his instructions and later walked out of Egypt following him.

The biblical records additionally show that Moses various his management patterns. before Jethro came to go to him, he carried a heavy load of work all with the aid of himself. Myron Rush talked about that it was an authoritative fashion of leadership because Moses needed to make each decision.21 After his encounter with Jethro his style of leadership modified to more of a consultative one.

Paul

Paul's vision changed into now not handiest clear to him however additionally to his followers. on account that his Damascus road enjoy, he knew he has been called by way of God to be a missionary.

Sanders located that Paul was a missionary trail-blazer, leaving in the back of him a string of recent churches. it's miles a significant face that the greatest missionary advances of the ultimate fifty years have observed the rediscovery or re-emphasis of Paul's missionary principles.22 it is because Paul's vision and principle of carrying out that imaginative and prescient become so clear that long after he has long past humans nevertheless observed his steps.

it is able to also be visible from the Acts narrative that Paul numerous his management styles. for example, within the contention among himself and Barnabas over John Mark, Paul displayed an authoritative style of management. maximum times he is likewise authoritative whilst handling problems within the Church. At different instances he tested a consultative fashion of management - in the problem that result in the Jerusalem council. it is able to be seen that Paul's leadership was function of a clear imaginative and prescient and converting leadership patterns.

David

 things are very clear in scripture approximately David. the primary is his imaginative and prescient for Israel and the second his imaginative and prescient for God. David turned into a king of battle and he led his military in warfare against Israel's enemies and took the land God gave to them. He also lived his existence in devotion to God. He had a imaginative and prescient to construct a residing location for the Lord. although God denied him this privilege, he made top notch preparations for this temple, which was later constructed by way of his son Solomon.

it's miles obvious in scripture that David changed his leadership styles in accordance with converting conditions. He displayed an authoritative management fashion when he led his men in warfare. as an example inside the situation while Nabal refused to praise him and his men with meals deliver for protecting his servants and sheep inside the fields. At different instances he confirmed a consultative fashion of leadership. while the biblical facts are tested, one could without a doubt see that David's leadership display characteristics of a clear imaginative and prescient and a changing style of management.

conclusion

In this newsletter a number of the traits of appropriate leadership have been recognized. This turned into performed under the subsequent headings: (a) the private traits of the chief, the characteristics of the fans and the chief's mission or fee. those divisions have been based totally at the findings of Anthony D'souza, which revealed that leadership entails an inter-dating among 3 elements - the chief, the followers and the assignment to be finished. Six characteristics of precise leadership had been recognized and they're as follows:

a) The non-public characteristics of the leader, which provide him his leadership capacity.
b) The leaders conduct or person that is shaped by the godly lifestyles he is living.
c) The willingness of the humans to follow without coercing.
d) The reproducing of leaders from the followers.
e) The clear imaginative and prescient of the leader, which subsequently turns into the people's vision and

awareness within the ministry.
f) The variations in the fashion of management to satisfy distinct management situations.

Six leaders, whose leaderships have been characterised as precise, had been used as check instances to look whether or not the characteristics mentioned can be discovered of their management. It become proved that these characteristics were obtrusive in each in their leadership. there are many extra qualification of appropriate leadership, however it is number one significance to have a balance within the three fundamental regions diagnosed. An character will have all of the good characteristics of leadership and but his leadership won't be exact due to his fashion of leadership. also, the people may not comply with the leader due to the fact his imaginative and prescient isn't always clean to them. properly leadership does not most effective depend on the chief or on the follower or the fashion of leadership however on all 3 of these traits. while there's a stability in these 3 regions, leadership becomes excellent and that turned into the kind of leadership Nehemiah, Moses, Paul and David portrayed.

give up NOTES

1. Anthony D'souze, Being a pacesetter (Achimota: African Christian Press, 1990),

p 25.

2. John White, Excellence In management: the sample of Nehemiah (Leicester:

Intervarsity Press, 1986), p 10-eleven.

three. Ibid, p 14.

four. Joyce Peel, A journey through The old testomony: The tale of God's

dating With guy lady and the arena (Oxford: The Bible reading

Fellowship, 1993), p 35.

5. Ibid, p 41.

6. Ibid. p 41.

7. John Stott, men With A Message: An introduction To New testament And Its

Writers (Suffolk: Evangelical Literature accept as true with, 1996), P 86.

eight. Ted W. Engstrom, The Making of A Christian leader (Michigan: Zondervan

Publishing residence, 1976), p 30.

9. John C Maxwell, The 21 maximum effective minutes In a pacesetter's Day; Revitalize Your

Spirit an Empower Your management (Nashville: Thomas Nelson's publisher, 2000), p four.

10. John C Maxwell, The 21 most powerful minutes In a leader's Day: Revitalize Your

Spirit and Empower Your management (Nashville: Thomas Nelsons Publishers, 2000),

P 68.

eleven. Oswald Sanders, spiritual management (Chicago: Moody Press, 1994), p 166.

12. Oswald Sanders, Paul the chief: A imaginative and prescient For Christian management these days (Glasgow:

Kingsway guide Ltd., 1983), p 42.

13. Eugene H Merrill, I Samuel: The Bible knowledge remark (Colorado: Chariot

Victor Publishing, 1985), p 449.

14. John Haggai, Lead On! leadership That Endures In A converting world (London: word

Publishing, 1986), p sixteen.

15. Ibid. p 17.

16. Anthony D'souza, Being a pacesetter (Achimota: African Christian Press, 1990), p 36

17. Myron Rush; management: A Biblical perspective (Illinois: Victor Books, 1996), p 219.

18. Myron Rush, management: A Biblical method (Illinios: Victor Books, 1983), p 226.

19. Joyce Peel, journey thru the antique testament: The tale of God's relationship with

man. lady and the sector (oxford: The Bible studying Fellowship, 1993), p 141.

20. Ted W Engstrom, The Making of A Christian chief: the way to expand control

And Human relations capabilities (Michigan: Zondervan Publishing house, 1976), p

21. Myron Rush, management: A Biblical angle (Illinois: Victor Books, 1976), p 220.

22. Oswald Sanders, Paul: A imaginative and prescient For Christian leadership today (Glasgow: Kingsway

ebook Ltd, 1983), p 967.

give up observe

1. Anthony D'souza, Being a frontrunner (Achimota: African Christian Press, 1990),

p 25.
2. John White, Excellence In leadership: the pattern of Nehemiah (Leicester:

Intervarsity Press, 1986), p 10-eleven.
3. Ibid. p 14.
four. Joyce Peel, A adventure through The old testament: The tale of God's

relationship With guy woman and the world (Oxford: The Bible studying

Fellowship, 1993), p 35.The characteristics of precise management
by means of Leopold A. Foullah  |   Submitted On June 17, 2008

endorse Article   Article comments 1   Print Article share this text on fb 2Share this text on Twitter proportion this article on Google+ share this article on Linkedin percentage this article on StumbleUpon 3Share this text on delicious 1Share this newsletter on Digg proportion this newsletter on Reddit percentage this article on Pinterest 1Expert writer Leopold A. Foullah
creation

a few leaderships have been characterized as accurate and have been used as challenges for others to emulate. This description however raises an obvious query: upon what standards were those management characterized as right? it's miles sure that some leaders, whose management does no longer fall inside this category, have true traits that others can emulate. for that reason it is important not only to realize that a leadership has been characterised as excellent but additionally to know the characteristics that qualifies it as correct. in keeping with Anthony D'souza, leadership includes an inter-courting among 3 factors:

(a) The first-class abilties and wishes of the followers
(b) The want and expectations of the institution
(c) The needs or requirements of the state of affairs.1

it may be found from what D'souza has said that the primary detail offers with the personality of the chief; the second, his fans and the 1/3, the challenge to be executed.

On the basis of what has been said the characteristics of true leadership can be identified under the following headings:-

(a) The non-public characteristics of the leader
(b) The traits of the followers
(c) The leader's venture or mission. selected leaders in the Bible, whose leaderships

had been classified as accurate will shape the idea of this presentation.

(a) The personal characteristics of the leader

it is able to be located from scriptures that God changed into very selective in choosing leaders for precise duties. God in particular chose Nehemiah to spearhead the rebuilding of the Jerusalem wall; Moses to bring the Israelites out of bondage in Egypt; Paul, to pioneer missionary work to the Gentiles and David, whose kinship would have an enduring dynasty, to update Saul. these guys definitely had qualities that were essential for right management. God identified these qualities in them as potentials whilst He chose them.

on this phase some of the traits of leaders noted above could be discussed in a extra popular manner. The aim is to show that it's been identified that the coolest personal qualities of leaders, while implemented to management are characteristics of exact leadership.

Nehemiah

In reflecting at the e-book of Nehemiah, John White stated that "the ebook of Nehemiah serves basically to unfold for us part of God's on-going plan for his humans. but always it is the person, his individual and his management that holds my interest".2 two critical things stand out from John White's evaluative announcement about Nehemiah's management which are function of right leadership. the first is the man or woman and behavior of Nehemiah himself as a pacesetter and the second, is his management ability. White similarly counseled that probable one of the motives why Nehemiah was selected as a cupbearer become due to a nicely-educated private best like that of a stable character. Such well-educated solid individual was no longer just the effort of Nehemiah on my own. this can be visible in the following announcement - "God used Nehemiah's energetic prayer lifestyles to mold him into a godly chief".three As a godly chief, Nehemiah changed into dependent upon God from whom he acquired his private help and encouragement, which encouraged him sufficient to succeed. Nehemiah finished his ministry purpose and his management has been characterised as appropriate. His true man or woman and conduct and his demonstration of management talents had been non-public characteristics of his leadership, which made him be triumphant.

Moses

Moses' youth education as an adopted son of Pharaoh's daughter become tailored towards management. The prevalence, which led to his get away from Egypt, found out that he recognized his management traits before God known as him to leadership. but, it took forty years from the time of his get away from Egypt, earlier than God referred to as him to leadership. Joyce Peel observed that Moses learns the way to be a shepherd. long years of looking after sheep taught him the patience he was to need as leader of the cantankerous youngsters of Israel.4 This remark with the aid of Joyce Peel shows that the personal exceptional of patience in Moses' life become a feature of his properly leadership. This satisfactory changed into made obvious within the lifestyles of Moses thru the awesome demanding situations he confronted as a leader over Israel. One example become whilst he came down from Mount Sinai and located the human beings worshiping the golden calf. He smashed the tablet inscribed with God's commandment, and, with a rousing cry, 'who is at the Lord's side?', summons the trustworthy Levites to a bloodbath.5 day after today he reproaches the human beings after which brokenhearted, goes returned up the mountain to plead for their forgiveness.6

patience turned into now not the simplest non-public satisfactory that Moses had. however it has been used to show that suitable private characteristics, while applied to management, bring about advantageous consequences. therefore, top private qualities are traits of good management.

Paul

Paul made superb achievements in the ministry God called him to. Achievements must but be seen as pointers to personal talents or features that a pacesetter has that made him to succeed. What then have been the ones qualities in Paul that made him to be triumphant? First it would be essential to study a number of the achievements that Paul made. He made superb impact in his missionary paintings and additionally in his writing. John Stott located that 13 letters ascribed to Paul in our New testament form almost precisely one zone of the whole New testament. It was the rediscovery of the theology of Paul which brought about the reformation of the sixteenth century, that theological revolution which caused an upheaval within the Roman Catholic Church and caused the beginning of all the contemporary Protestant churches.7 Paul's educational background gave him this gain. It should not cross overlooked that this splendid apostle used all that he had individually performed in his childhood in his management function. using his personal characteristics in bringing approximately advantageous effects in his management turned into a function of Paul's excellent leadership.

David

in keeping with Ted W. Engstrom, David the second king of Israel become a placing comparison to Saul, the primary king.eight This turned into due to his noble, beneficiant and admirable features he verified in his leadership. This comparison shows that David's management become now not simplest higher than Saul's but his leadership may be characterized as appropriate. John C. Maxwell also as compared the 2 leaders. In answer to a query, which he posed - 'Why did Saul fail as Israel's king at the same time as David, who appeared to be weaker succeed?' he stated that it changed into because of David's mindset. not like Saul, David tried to emerge as a higher leader.nine it's far clear from these two authors that David's non-public traits, specifically that of his attitude to usually be a higher leader had been characteristics of his true management. Having the qualification or characteristics is one element, however making use of them in a single's management role is quite any other. David implemented his management features in leading and made an impact as a pacesetter.

The traits of the followers

a number of the characteristics of good leadership may be diagnosed with the followers. earlier than figuring out those characteristics, it would be useful to take a look at a few definitions of leadership, to be reminded of the connection among leaders and fans. according to Oswald Sanders, leadership is affect. it's far the potential of one person to persuade others to follow his or her lead. Ted W. Enngstrom defines leadership with just  phrases - 'leaders lead'. Myron Rush also gave a definition of leadership and his definition of management as 'chief reproducing himself at the followers'. those definitions factor to the relationship between leaders and fans but most significantly, what they considered to be the purpose of the relationship. Oswald Sanders and Engstrom awareness on the factor of following. This consciousness identifies one of the traits of a good leadership - willing fans. If one offers consideration to D'souza's factor noted inside the creation, that one of the elements of leadership is 'the needs and expectancies of the institution', it follows that one purpose why people will willingly observe their leader is due to the fact their needs and expectations are met. another feature can be identified from Myron Rush's definition - making leader out of followers, there is a assure of the continuity of that ministry. The four leaders, Nehemiah, Moses, Paul and David, whose leaderships had been categorised as appropriate, will now be used as take a look at case to identify the 2 traits.

Nehemiah

whilst Nehemiah returned to Jerusalem from Susa, he first in my view assessed the situation of Jerusalem's destruction. Afterwards he known as the people and shared his vision. The Bible said that the human beings spoke back to Nehemiah (see Neh. 2:8). This suggests absolutely that from the start of his venture Nehemiah had inclined followers. They have been willing to observe because they understand that the vision become top and that a number of their wishes as a network might be met. Maxwell cited that the wall of Jerusalem became rebuilt because of Nehemiah's ability to paintings with humans and lead them where they want to go.10 This suggests that Nehemiah had willing fans.

further Nehemiah gave reputation to subordinate leaders as he delegated responsibilities to them. This, as he stated, opens the management potentials for others.11 consequently it is easy to rightly say that Nehemiah not most effective had willing followers however also leaders were reproduced beneath his ministry.

Moses

when Moses again to Egypt to set the Israelites unfastened, they were at first excited. but whilst Moses made their situation worse they have been no longer enthusiastic about freedom. however, through the cease of the ninth plague they had realized that Moses became God's servant despatched to supply them. They followed Moses' commands in staring at the Passover and then willingly followed him as he led them out of Egypt.

there's also scriptural proof that leaders have been produced under Moses' leadership. One instance is that of Joshua, who changed him. Joshua who have been the private assistant of Moses became mentored by way of Moses to emerge as a leader. Moses' management therefore had the traits of willing followers and that of reproducing leaders.

Paul

even when he turned into "Paul the elderly", he remained the model and leader of a set of dynamic younger men. the affection he kindled in his fans' coronary heart changed into mirrored within the tears that flowed whilst he informed them they could see him no greater (Acts 20: 36-38).12 Sanders found out inside the passage mentioned above that the apostle Paul's management had the characteristics of inclined fans. His ministry had exquisite impact in the lives of many, who were also no longer inclined to trade his leadership for every other.

like the Lord Jesus, Paul invested his existence on some humans due to the fact he expected much from them. these were the people he took on his missionary journeys.  of the people, Timothy and Titus have become leaders of local church buildings. consequently, like Moses, Paul's management had the traits of inclined fans and that of producing leaders.

David

David rose to fame when he killed Goliath, the Philistine large. Eugene H. Merrill, commenting on David's victory reserved that with his rising recognition some of the people got here a deterioration of his dating with Saul, for the king became insanely jealous of Israel's new hero.13 it's far apparent that David had a big following. human beings observed him due to the potential they noticed in him. They identified him as a brilliant leader, even before reliable reputation become given to him.

David dominated Israel for approximately 40 years and by the point he become stepping down as king, Solomon, his son had already been groomed for that position. So, like Nehemiah, Moses and Paul, David's management become characterised by inclined fans and the producing of leaders.

(c) The leader's task or commission

it is able to be determined from scripture that God usually provide a selected venture or task to every person he calls to leadership. a number of the characteristics of desirable management can be diagnosed within the way the leaders set out to perform their mission or mission. There are  matters that are of primary significance to how a leader accomplishes his task. those are his vision and his fashion of leadership. a frontrunner's imaginative and prescient and fashion of leadership can be characteristics of both correct and horrific management. however, in this segment the motive is to shoe how these two traits can be traits of top leadership.

according to John Haggai, a imaginative and prescient is vital because it's far a key component in a success leadership.14 a frontrunner may have an excellent imaginative and prescient and but his vision does not make contributions in any manner to make his management precise. Haggai factors out what a pacesetter wishes to do to make his vision a contributing characteristic to accurate leadership. First, he says that each leaders and fans must grasp the vision. it is the chief's responsibility to help the followers understand the imaginative and prescient and take delivery of it. 2d, each leader and fans should commit themselves to act at the imaginative and prescient. This motion involves designing a aim software to meet the imaginative and prescient. on this way both the leader and fans are prepared to face difficulties and do away with obstacles. it is in this manner that a imaginative and prescient may be a feature of desirable management.15

the alternative components mentioned that may be a feature of an awesome leadership is the fashion of management. leadership patterns were given specific classification via authors. Anthony D'souza categorised management styles in a continuum wherein one quit is defined as task-oriented and the alternative as courting-orientated.sixteen Myron Rush additionally agreed with D'souza that management patterns can be seen in a continuum, however he used one-of-a-kind descriptive phrases for the exceptional patterns inside the continuum.17 The 4 styles used within Rush's continuum are: dictatorial, authoritative, consultative and participative. those authors argument approximately patterns became not to factor out the high-quality but as an alternative to reveal the significance of all of them. The point that they were making was that a good management had the characteristics of the one-of-a-kind leadership styles. The chief need to be bendy to the converting situations. when he is able to alter his management styles to changing situations, then his leadership patterns... grow to be characteristics of desirable management. Myron Rush gave examples of situations wherein specific management styles are suitable. He stated, dictatorial management fashion is suitable in an emergency or when humans's lives, are at stake; consultative fashion in conducting on-going making plans for the department or corporation; authoritative fashion whilst personnel constantly misuse authority and participative style as human beings end up capable in appearing their recurring responsibilities.18

The 4 leaders noted on this paper, whose leaderships had been classified as right, will now be used as check instances to decide whether the points stated here are traits in their leaderships.

Nehemiah

Joyce Peel, commenting on Nehemiah's mission of constructing the partitions of Jerusalem said that a dispirited state desires an stimulated chief who can unite and galvanize his people into action. this kind of guy became Nehemiah.19 those phrases not best revealed that Nehemiah had a clear imaginative and prescient of his challenge but additionally became able to make his fans understand the vision and devote themselves to act on it. This become simply one cause why they had been able to rebuild the partitions in fifty- days. Many Jews lamented over the ruins of Jerusalem town wall, but it took the vision of one man, who united the humans and gave them hope to change the scenario. Engstrom also pointed to the reality that the human beings caught Nehemiah's vision and acted upon it, whilst he noted: "One has most effective to read the ebook of Nehemiah to find out the importance of people at work. The leaders in building the temple and town partitions in no way overpassed the total aim and basic photograph. They have been capable of preserve this recognition with the aid of using all the human beings as well as experts who had been trained to do precise paintings".20 Nehemiah's management had the characteristic of a clear vision which became actively pursued by way of himself and his followers.

it can be determined from the e-book of Nehemiah, that Nehemiah used the consultative style of leadership while he were given to Jerusalem to begin the paintings. but inside the last few chapters of the ebook, when matters have been going wrong, his fashion of management modified to an authoritative one. consequently it could be stated that Nehemiah's leadership had the characteristics of a vision and a changing style of management.

Moses

Moses has a clean vision while he returned to Egypt to lead the kids of Israel out of bondage. The Israelites desired to be free, however they doubted the opportunity of Moses placing them free. however, once they became positive that Moses become God's servant who will set them free from bondage, they obeyed his commands and later walked out of Egypt following him.

The biblical information additionally show that Moses varied his leadership patterns. earlier than Jethro came to visit him, he carried a heavy load of work all by himself. Myron Rush mentioned that it become an authoritative style of management because Moses had to make each decision.21 After his come upon with Jethro his fashion of management modified to more of a consultative one.

Paul

Paul's imaginative and prescient changed into no longer most effective clear to him but additionally to his followers. on the grounds that his Damascus avenue revel in, he knew he has been called with the aid of God to be a missionary.

Sanders determined that Paul changed into a missionary path-blazer, leaving at the back of him a string of new church buildings. it is a great face that the greatest missionary advances of the closing fifty years have followed the rediscovery or re-emphasis of Paul's missionary ideas.22 it's miles due to the fact Paul's imaginative and prescient and precept of engaging in that imaginative and prescient become so clear that lengthy after he has gone humans still accompanied his steps.

it can also be seen from the Acts narrative that Paul various his management patterns. for example, within the rivalry between himself and Barnabas over John Mark, Paul displayed an authoritative fashion of management. most times he is likewise authoritative when handling troubles within the Church. At different times he established a consultative style of management - in the problem that lead to the Jerusalem council. it may be seen that Paul's leadership become characteristic of a clear imaginative and prescient and converting leadership patterns.

David

 matters are very clear in scripture approximately David. the first is his vision for Israel and the second his imaginative and prescient for God. David changed into a king of warfare and he led his navy in war towards Israel's enemies and took the land God gave to them. He also lived his existence in devotion to God. He had a imaginative and prescient to build a dwelling location for the Lord. even though God denied him this privilege, he made tremendous preparations for this temple, which became later constructed through his son Solomon.

it is obtrusive in scripture that David modified his leadership styles in accordance with converting situations. He displayed an authoritative management style while he led his men in war. as an example in the situation whilst Nabal refused to reward him and his guys with food supply for protective his servants and sheep within the fields. At different instances he tested a consultative style of leadership. whilst the biblical records are examined, one could definitely see that David's management display traits of a clear vision and a changing style of leadership.

conclusion

In this text some of the traits of correct leadership have been diagnosed. This was achieved under the subsequent headings: (a) the non-public traits of the chief, the traits of the fans and the leader's project or fee. these divisions were based totally on the findings of Anthony D'souza, which discovered that leadership involves an inter-relationship between 3 elements - the chief, the fans and the mission to be carried out. Six characteristics of suitable leadership were recognized and they may be as follows:

a) The private characteristics of the leader, which provide him his leadership capacity.
b) The leaders behavior or man or woman that is fashioned by using the godly existence he's living.
c) The willingness of the human beings to observe with out coercing.
d) The reproducing of leaders from the followers.
e) The clear imaginative and prescient of the chief, which subsequently becomes the human beings's vision and

focus inside the ministry.
f) The versions in the style of leadership to meet distinct leadership conditions.

Six leaders, whose leaderships had been characterized as good, had been used as take a look at instances to peer whether the traits cited can be observed in their leadership. It was proved that those traits have been glaring in each in their leadership. there are numerous more qualification of good leadership, however it is primary importance to have a balance in the three important regions recognized. An character can have all of the proper traits of leadership and but his management might not be precise due to his style of leadership. additionally, the humans may not comply with the chief because his vision is not clear to them. precise management does not best depend on the leader or on the follower or the style of leadership but on all three of those features. while there's a balance in these 3 areas, leadership will become notable and that turned into the type of leadership Nehemiah, Moses, Paul and David portrayed.

give up NOTES

1. Anthony D'souze, Being a pacesetter (Achimota: African Christian Press, 1990),

p 25.

2. John White, Excellence In management: the pattern of Nehemiah (Leicester:

Intervarsity Press, 1986), p 10-11.

three. Ibid, p 14.

four. Joyce Peel, A journey via The vintage testament: The story of God's

dating With man lady and the arena (Oxford: The Bible reading

Fellowship, 1993), p 35.

five. Ibid, p 41.

6. Ibid. p 41.

7. John Stott, men With A Message: An introduction To New testomony And Its

Writers (Suffolk: Evangelical Literature believe, 1996), P 86.

eight. Ted W. Engstrom, The Making of A Christian leader (Michigan: Zondervan

Publishing residence, 1976), p 30.

nine. John C Maxwell, The 21 most powerful minutes In a leader's Day; Revitalize Your

Spirit an Empower Your management (Nashville: Thomas Nelson's publisher, 2000), p four.

10. John C Maxwell, The 21 maximum powerful mins In a leader's Day: Revitalize Your

Spirit and Empower Your management (Nashville: Thomas Nelsons Publishers, 2000),

P sixty eight.

11. Oswald Sanders, non secular leadership (Chicago: Moody Press, 1994), p 166.

12. Oswald Sanders, Paul the chief: A vision For Christian management nowadays (Glasgow:

Kingsway ebook Ltd., 1983), p 42.

13. Eugene H Merrill, I Samuel: The Bible expertise statement (Colorado: Chariot

Victor Publishing, 1985), p 449.

14. John Haggai, Lead On! leadership That Endures In A changing global (London: word

Publishing, 1986), p sixteen.

15. Ibid. p 17.

16. Anthony D'souza, Being a pacesetter (Achimota: African Christian Press, 1990), p 36

17. Myron Rush; control: A Biblical attitude (Illinois: Victor Books, 1996), p 219.

18. Myron Rush, control: A Biblical method (Illinios: Victor Books, 1983), p 226.

19. Joyce Peel, adventure through the vintage testament: The story of God's relationship with

man. female and the arena (oxford: The Bible studying Fellowship, 1993), p 141.

20. Ted W Engstrom, The Making of A Christian chief: the way to develop management

And Human family members competencies (Michigan: Zondervan Publishing house, 1976), p

21. Myron Rush, management: A Biblical attitude (Illinois: Victor Books, 1976), p 220.

22. Oswald Sanders, Paul: A vision For Christian leadership nowadays (Glasgow: Kingsway

ebook Ltd, 1983), p 967.

quit notice

1. Anthony D'souza, Being a leader (Achimota: African Christian Press, 1990),

p 25.
2. John White, Excellence In management: the pattern of Nehemiah (Leicester:

Intervarsity Press, 1986), p 10-11.
three. Ibid. p 14.
4. Joyce Peel, A journey through The antique testament: The tale of God's

relationship With man girl and the arena (Oxford: The Bible studying

Fellowship, 1993), p 35.